How Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) Impact Your Health

Published:
Last Updated: Apr 06, 2021

Written by

Activists began raising concerns about the potential impact of electromagnetic fields from power lines, electrical wiring, cell phones and other electronic devices in the 1980s.

Since then, there have been repeated warning signs that exposure to electromagnetic radiation stemming from modern electronics may cause cancer and other diseases.

In this blog post, I’ll explain what EMFs are and how they interact with the human body. We’ll also discuss the scientific evidence behind the claims that man-made EMFs can make us sick, and I’ll show you methods you can use to reduce your exposure to electromagnetic fields in your home or place of work.

What Are EMFs?

Electromagnetic Spectrum
Some EMFs occur naturally, while others are man-made.

EMFs are electromagnetic fields that are produced by charged particles (such as atoms) with a surplus or deficit of electrons. 

When charged particles move, they create a magnetic field. If you paid attention in physics class, you may remember that electricity can only exist when particles exchange (or steal) electrons.

So we can conclude that electricity and electronic devices cause electromagnetic fields! 

Electromagnetic Fields in Nature

Electronic devices are one source of electromagnetic radiation (EMR). But they are not the only source. In fact, EMFs have existed since the beginning of the universe as we know it. 

In other words, EMFs are an essential part of nature that we cannot get rid of or avoid.

In fact, our bodies constantly create low-frequency electromagnetic fields as part of the inner workings of cells. Remember, cells are made up of atoms that move around to do their job. That movement creates EMFs.

But does that mean EMFs are harmless and that we shouldn’t worry about them? 

Not so fast!

Health Effects of Man-Made EMFs

How Aires works
How Aires’ technology works.

Electromagnetic fields can propagate as (electromagnetic) waves that carry energy. The amount of energy they can carry depends on their frequency. The higher the frequency, the more energy they can carry.

Some electromagnetic waves are so powerful that they can break molecular bonds. Gamma rays, microwaves and x-rays are three examples of waves that can break the bonds between molecules and cause harm to our bodies. 

That’s called ionizing radiation, because when molecular bonds are broken, charged particles (known as ions) can transfer from one atom to another.

Another issue with ionizing radiation is that it can damage cells, break strands of DNA and meddle with DNA repair. That can lead to cell death and prevent DNA from replicating correctly. Scientists believe that the latter is a major contributor to the development of cancer.

So what about EMFs (also known as non-ionizing radiation) caused by power lines, smart meters, Wi-Fi routers, cell phones and other electronic devices? 

The short answer is that man-made electromagnetic radiation from consumer electronics and our modern infrastructure causes tissue heating. But it’s unclear how that affects our health in the long-term.

As with food, exercise and sleep, people are unique and may react differently (either positively or negatively) to certain types of EMFs. That said, there are several studies that clearly demonstrate changes in cell function during exposure to EMFs and EMR. The extent to which these changes cause long-term damage to our health (or if they cause any damage at all) is still unknown and subject to further studies.

However, it’s safe to say that we’re exposed to significantly more (and more types of) electromagnetic radiation than at any time in human history. 

So you have two choices:

  1. Assume that man-made EMFs don’t cause us harm until proven otherwise.
  2. Accept that humans have a track record of creating products that turn out to be detrimental to their health in the long run.

I’m in Camp #2 because I’ve watched the “let’s wait and see if it’s bad for our health” strategy fail with lead paint, plastic food containers, low-fat foods and vegetable oils (just to name a few). 

From my perspective, many of the things that humans have invented to simplify or “improve” our lives, but which have shifted us away from how things work in nature, have caused health issues.   

When it comes to EMFs, it might take decades or longer to prove whether or not they’re detrimental to our health at our current levels of exposure. And frankly, I don’t want to wait around to find out whether I’ve done damage to my body by failing to account for the potential risks they pose.

You Can’t Avoid Electromagnetic Radiation

Faraday Cage
Faraday cages protect you from EMFs — but they’re not very practical.

Even before the discovery of electricity, humans were exposed to EMFs from natural sources, such as the earth and the sun. Our bodies are accustomed to the wavelengths and intensities of everyday EMFs, and I’m not suggesting living in a Faraday cage or running around with a tin hat.

Instead, my recommendation is to reduce your exposure to unnatural EMFs — those created by electronic devices in your household, power lines and cell towers. 

Note: A Faraday cage is a container made of conducting material, such as wire mesh or metal plates, that shields whatever is enclosed from external electric fields. For example, when you’re inside your car and the car gets struck by lightning, you won’t be harmed because the metal chassis of the car redirects the electrical current into the ground. That’s the basic principle of a Faraday cage, named after its inventor Michael Faraday.

Determining Safe Levels of EMF Exposure

Considering that we don’t yet understand the long-term effects of EMF exposure, it’s impossible to say what levels of exposure are safe for the human body.

Nevertheless, the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) maintains international guidelines for EMF exposure. Additionally, certain countries have established “safe” levels for EMFs, as you can see in the table below.

Note that the table below does not contain data for the United States, which does not have any federal EMF safety standards.

Magnetic (mG)Electric (V/m)RF (mW/m2)
Russia100500100
China1,0004,000400
ICNIRP2,0005,00010,000
IEEE9,0405,00010,000

As you can see, there is quite a spread between countries as far as “safe” levels are concerned. While some of that is due to the fact that European limits (which align with ICNIRP) are based on the thermal impact of EMF on the human body, whereas the Russian and Chinese limits focus more on dose over extended exposure periods, it demonstrates that nobody really knows what level of EMF exposure is safe over time.

As indicated above, my take on safe EMF levels is simple: long-term exposure to (high levels of) EMFs that don’t occur in nature is likely to affect us in one way or another. As a result, I try to reduce my exposure to unnatural EMFs as much as I can without taking radical measures that would disrupt life as I know it.

How to Measure EMF Radiation

EMF meter reading
An EMF reading from inside my office.

Before you can consider EMF mitigation strategies, you first need to figure out what your exposure to EMF radiation is in your home, office and other places where you spend significant amounts of time.

So how can you measure electromagnetic fields? 

The easiest way is with an EMF meter like the TriField EMF meter model TF2* that I’ve been using for the past four weeks.

The TF2 can detect three types of EMF pollution, including AC magnetic, AC electric and RF/microwave. Additionally, it can respond to standard and weighted magnetic and electric frequencies. 

“Standard” measures the strength of the field regardless of frequency (40Hz – 100kHz), while “weighted” measures only frequencies above 60Hz (which can create more electric current inside the human body).

For a limited time, get your Lumen for $274 by using the code MK25 at checkout.

According to the TF2’s manual, “at 60Hz, the body is receiving field pulses 60 times per second, while at 120Hz, the body is receiving twice the number of pulses, or 120 times per second, though the field remains the same.”

I’ve measured EMF pollution in every room of our home, and you can see the results in the table below. The numbers in bold indicate a reading above what TriField considers normal levels in a typical household, based on their research.

RoomMagneticElectricRF
Master BR0.4 mG22 V/m1.200 mW/m2
Family Room1.5 mG12 V/m18.000 mW/m2
Office10.6 mG48 V/m12.900 mW/m2
Kids’ BR2.0 mG171 V/m 3.600 mW/m2
Guest BR0.3 mG2 V/m0.800 mW/m2
Loft4 mG33 V/m8.000 mW/m2
The numbers in the Magnetic and Electric columns represent weighted scores from different areas of the rooms we frequently occupy.

As you can see, we’re exposed to increased levels of electromagnetic radiation in some areas of the house, due to the electric wiring (in the kids’ bunk beds), my previous desire to blanket the house in perfect Wi-Fi (RF radiation) and kitchen appliances. Seeing these numbers is what triggered me to look for ways to reduce our exposure.

Of course, all the readings above are spot readings, which means there could be higher or lower readings in other areas of the same room. I tried to capture readings from commonly occupied areas of each room and mark the highest ones. If you want to measure EMFs in your home, I recommend walking around with an EMF meter and taking note of the highest readings. 

Six Steps We’ve Taken to Reduce Our EMF Exposure at Home

These are the six steps we’ve taken here at the Kummer household to reduce our EMF exposure.

  1. Turn off wireless access points and routers when we don’t need them, or reduce their power output in the configuration settings.
  2. Use headphones to make phone calls (wired headphones are best).
  3. Don’t charge our cell phones and smartwatches on our nightstands.
  4. Use EMF mitigation devices.
  5. Cover our smart meter.
  6. Don’t place our laptops directly on our laps.

1. Turn Off Wireless Access Points

UniFi Access Points in the Kummer Home
I turned off two of the five access points we have at the Kummer house.

Considering that my family’s highest EMF exposure stems from radio frequencies, I suspected the five access points that provide Wi-Fi coverage in our home might be a major culprit. 

As a result of the findings outlined in the table above, I decided to shut down some of our access points and reduce the signal strength of others. 

The good news is that with fewer competing access points, I should also have fewer issues with interference and channel hopping. The latter might help with the reliability of my HomeKit devices, which has been a problem.

To take things even further, I wrote a script to disable all our access points at 10 p.m. and re-enable them at 4:55 a.m. (shortly before I start my day). Doing this should significantly reduce our exposure to RF radiation while we sleep.

Technically, what I’ve done is add scheduled tasks (on each of the UniFi switches that provide power to the access points via ethernet) that disable and re-enable the switch ports the APs are connected to. I wish UniFi had a configuration setting for this, but my workaround is good enough for now.

While taking the steps I outlined above helps reduce our EMF exposure at night, they don’t help much during the day. So we needed something that could mitigate the harmful effects of EMFs without requiring the removal of the offending devices. The solution was EMF modulation technology (see #4 in the list, below).

On a side note, I’ve always made fun of my parents for turning off their internet modem at night. They do it to conserve energy, not to reduce their exposure to EMFs. But the more I learn about the subject, the more I think it’s a smart move.

2. Use Headphones to Make Phone Calls

WaveBlock Pro on my AirPods Pro
I use EMF shielding stickers from WaveBlock on my AirPods Pro.

Many studies have investigated the potential association between mobile phone use and certain types of brain cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the WHO, even declared EMFs as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” based on an increased risk for glioma, a type of brain cancer.

Considering that wireless phones have been around for decades, you may think that we should know for sure by now whether or not they actually increase the risk of cancer.

Unfortunately, we do not. However, a systematic review and meta-analysis on mobile phone use and glioma risk concluded that “there was a significant positive association between long-term mobile phone use (minimum, 10 years) and glioma. And there was a significant positive association between long-term ipsilateral mobile phone use and the risk of glioma. Long-term mobile phone use was associated with 2.22 times greater odds of low-grade glioma occurrence.”

The authors of this meta-analysis also concluded that “current evidence is of poor quality and limited quantity. It is therefore necessary to conduct large sample, high-quality research or better characterization of any potential association between long-term ipsilateral mobile phone use and glioma risk.”

Why we haven’t designed better studies with larger sample sizes — despite strong correlations of certain types of EMFs and brain cancer — is, quite frankly, beyond me. 

If I had to guess, it’s because such studies require significant funding and the two biggest sources of money for large studies are governments and private industry. I don’t think either entity wants to take the risk of discovering that cell phone usage might be bad for our health. 

Can you imagine the disruption to everyday life such findings would cause?

Regardless of the hard scientific evidence, it’s a fact that your mobile phone creates the strongest electromagnetic fields during phone calls. As a result, I advise you to use headphones instead of keeping the phone close to your head, where the EMFs can alter brain cell activity. 

Of course, wired headphones are best because they don’t require Bluetooth, another source of electromagnetic radiation. That said, all of the headphones I own are wireless, and I’ll continue using them because (based on my testing) my AirPods create a much weaker EMF than my iPhone. 

So I would rather have my AirPods close to my head than my phone.

I’ve also seen EMF-blocking stickers for AirPods (such as these) but I’m not convinced that they won’t interfere with the connectivity between the AirPods and the device they’re paired to. To find out, I ordered a pair and will update this article with my findings.

3. Don’t Charge Your Cell Phone and Smartwatch on Your Nightstand

Most of us charge our cell phones, smartwatches and the other electronics we use every day on our nightstand, because doing so is convenient. Others even put their phones under their pillow before they fall asleep, after scrolling through social media before going to bed. My wife has been known to do so on occasion.

I encourage you not to do that. Instead, keep your devices as far away from your body at night as possible. You certainly don’t want to sleep with your head on top of a cell phone (even if you’re not actively using cellular connectivity).

If you must keep your phone close by at night, I recommend enabling airplane mode to disable cellular, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity. If that’s not possible — maybe because you’re on call and have to be reachable at any time — I recommend placing your phone a few feet away from your bed.

I created a Siri Shortcut that automatically enables airplane mode at 8:30 p.m. and disables it at 5 a.m., so I can’t forget to do so. If you have an iPhone running a newer version of iOS, just download and open the Shortcuts app, go to Automations (bottom icon) and create two automations as shown in the screenshots above.

4. Use EMF Mitigation Devices

My Lifetune Personal that I keep on my nightstand
My Lifetune Personal that I keep on my nightstand.

Knowing that I have no simple way to dramatically reduce my family’s EMF exposure without making significant sacrifices to our technology-supported lifestyle, I decided to experiment with EMF mitigation devices from Aires that supposedly reduce the potentially harmful effects EMFs have on our health.

I talk about how I’m using these devices in more detail later in the article. 

5. Cover Your Smart Meter

Smart Meter EMF Shield
A smart meter EMF shield.

A smart meter is an electronic device that’s often located on the outside of an exterior wall and that records, among other things, your power consumption (reporting it back to the utility company). 

But as with wireless access points, smart meters emit radiofrequency (RF) signals that contribute to the overall EMF pollution in your home.

One easy way to mitigate the risk originating from smart meters is to cover them with an EMF shield that acts like a Faraday cage. You can find them on Amazon for less than $40*.

6. Don’t Place Your Laptop Directly on Your Lap

Many people place laptops on their laps, while others avoid doing that because of the heat such devices produce. While heat is certainly an inconvenience, think about the electromagnetic radiation roasting your (reproductive) organs while you have the laptop in your lap. 

That’s why I recommend getting a laptop pad that has EMF-blocking properties, such as the ones you can find on Amazon*

I usually don’t have my MacBook on my lap because I prefer working on a stable surface, such as a table. That’s why I use Lifetune* instead of a laptop pad.

Aires EMF Modulation Technology

Brain activity during mobile phone use
Brain activity during mobile phone use, with and without EMF mitigation devices.

It’s important to understand the difference between EMF modulation and protection. The methods to accomplish the latter (e.g., shielding) come down to reducing the intensity of the EM pulse, reducing exposure time, or increasing the distance from the source of the radiation. 

All of that usually leads to limiting the functionality of the radiation source — for example, by putting a steel cage on top of a wireless router effectively disables its Wi-Fi capabilities.

EMF modulation technology supposedly changes (modulates) electromagnetic fields to make their waveforms more coherent and thus more compatible with natural sources of these fields.

The restructuring of technogenic EM radiation in the proposed method implies changing its amplitude-frequency spectrum from an arbitrary form to a coherent form through the influence of a coherent field created by a transformer that initiates the process of counter- harmonization of amplitudes, phases, frequencies, polarization vectors, and the EM radiation incident on it.

Aires Technology

In other words, the idea is not to block EMFs (which could render electronics such as Wi-Fi routers and cell phones unusable), but to make the radiation more compatible with the human body. 

If you have a Ph.D. in math or physics, I encourage you to read this article that tries to explain in painstaking detail how the technology Aires invented works. In a nutshell, Aires claims that its devices (transformers) create a coherent (electromagnetic) field that harmonizes the amplitudes, phases, frequencies and polarization vectors of the surrounding radiation, without limiting their function. 

It’s somewhat similar to the principle behind noise-canceling headphones, which produce counter-frequencies that mask the ambient noise so you don’t hear them anymore. However, EMF modulation technology doesn’t cancel out radiation, it just harmonizes it to make it more coherent and compatible with natural radiation that our bodies are used to.

The first company I discovered that makes such EMF modulation devices is Aires, and they sent me a couple of their devices for testing — including one that I have installed directly on my iPhone, and one that’s on my nightstand.

Aires EMF modulation devices contain small microchips that supposedly absorb surrounding electromagnetic waves and change their waveforms to make them less harmful. 

To visualize their effects on the human body, you have to use an encephalograph (a device that records electrical activity in the brain) or similar devices under laboratory conditions. 

The image above shows the differences in electrical activity in the brain before and during cell phone use. The image in the middle clearly demonstrates how electromagnetic radiation emitted by a cell phone triggers electric activity in the brain. The image on the right shows almost no electric activity during cell phone use in combination with an Aires device.

Again, it’s still not 100% clear how the increased electrical activity in the brain during cell phone use impacts our health in the long-term, but I think it’s foolish to assume that it doesn’t.

Aires offers several different devices of various sizes that the company claims can significantly reduce the impact of man-made EMFs on your body. 

Here’s an overview of their lineup:

  • Lifetune Device: A coin-shaped EMR protection device that I have installed on my iPhone.
  • Lifetune Pet: Shaped like a charm, you can hang it around your pet’s neck.
  • Lifetune Personal: A personal EMR protection device that you can carry in your pocket or use as a necklace. I’ve placed mine on the nightstand next to me.
  • Lifetune Room: A larger EMR protection device you can mount on the wall to protect an entire room.

To learn more about Lifetune EMF mitigation devices, including pricing and scientific evidence, check out airestech.com*.

How We Use EMF Shielding Devices at Home

Lifetune Device on my iPhone 12 Pro Max
The Lifetune Device on my iPhone 12 Pro Max.

Besides trying to reduce our exposure to electromagnetic radiation by reconfiguring our wireless access points, I decided to install several Aires EMF mitigation devices throughout the house.

As I mentioned above, I already have one of these devices (the Lifetune Device) installed on the back of my iPhone 12 Pro Max, and I have another one (the Lifetune Personal) on my nightstand.

Aires claims that the effectiveness of each of these devices is directly related to their size. In other words, the Lifetune Device has a relatively narrow operating radius, which is why I had to stick it to the back of my cell phone. The Lifetune Personal is much larger and has an operating radius of approximately 50 square feet. That’s why I need it close to my body for it to be effective.

I was initially super excited about the prospect of reducing the (potentially) harmful effects of EMFs using a mitigation device, such as Lifetune.

However, I’ve grown a bit skeptical because I don’t understand any of the technical explanations of how these devices are supposed to work. I’ve read countless scientific papers over the years, and while I don’t always have expert knowledge of the topic, I usually understand at least the essence of what the authors are trying to convey.

In the case of Aires, their papers might as well be written in a foreign language. Maybe that’s because the original papers were written in Russian and later translated into English, but it doesn’t inspire confidence in the technology.

Additionally, I realized that most of the cited patents are for the design of the device and the only patents associated with the function of Lifetune were filed exclusively in Russia.

The bottom line is that I’m not 100% convinced that Aires’s technology works as advertised, but I’ll keep an eye on it and update this article as I learn more.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are safe EMF levels?

As far as I know, there are no absolute safe levels that the United States has established for EMFs. However, based on the existing scientific evidence, there haven’t been any harmful effects associated with the levels listed below:

– 3mG standard magnetic or 5mG weighted magnetic.
– 50 V/m Standard or Weighted electric.
– 0.200 mW/m2 Standard or 1.000 mW/m2 peak measurement.

As you can see in the table of EMF readings from around my house, I didn’t find a spot in our home that had magnetic fields above these threshold levels. Additionally, I didn’t record any electric radiation above 50 V/m, unless I held the meter right next to a power outlet or light switch.

The reason why I measured relatively high electric radiation in our kids’ bunk beds is because the previous owner of the house ran electric wires inside the framing of the bunk beds so that each kid has their own light. To mitigate this issue, we just moved the kids’ pillows to the other side of the bed, so their head (and pillow) wouldn’t be close to the wiring.

As far as RF radiation is concerned, you’re more likely to reach or surpass the limits mentioned above. Being close to a single wireless access point might already be enough to reach potentially unhealthy levels. We have several access points and dozens of Wi-Fi-enabled devices in our home, and I’ve recorded significantly higher levels at various spots in our home than what some consider to be “safe levels.”

What are common sources of magnetic fields?

Any electric device is a potential source of magnetic fields. The most common sources include power lines, appliances, wiring in walls and motors.

What are common sources of electric fields?

As the name implies, any electric device is a potential source of electric fields. The most common sources include fluorescent lights, wall outlets, wiring and electrical switches.

What are common sources of RF radiation?

The most common sources of RF radiation are cell phones, Wi-Fi routers, microwave ovens, radio/TV stations and smart meters.

What’s worse: nearby cell phone towers or my cell phone?

Usually, the impact of electromagnetic radiation declines with distance. As a result, a nearby cell phone tower is likely to be less problematic than talking on a cell phone while holding the device close to your head.

Is it dangerous to live near power lines?

I haven’t seen any evidence to suggest living near power lines is immediately life-threatening. However, depending on how close you live to them and how much voltage they carry, you might be exposed to electromagnetic radiation.

If you live near power lines, I recommend getting an EMF meter and measuring your exposure levels. Depending on your findings, you can decide whether or not taking action (such as installing an EMF mitigation device) is warranted.

What is dirty electricity?

Dirty electricity is a term that describes environmental exposure to high-frequency voltage transients (HFVT). In other words, it’s the electromagnetic pollution caused by electric fields.

Are baby monitors a source of EMFs?

Yes, any electronic gadget, including baby monitors, is a source of electromagnetic frequencies. As a result, I recommend placing them as far away from your baby’s crib as feasible. 

Do wireless charging pads (Qi devices) emit EMFs?

Absolutely! Qi chargers use electromagnetic fields to transfer energy. In a way, they’re the perfect example of how powerful wireless radiation can be (i.e., it can charge your cell phone).

Do cordless phones emit EMFs?

Yes! Much like baby monitors and other wireless devices, cordless phones emit EMFs and I don’t recommend using them without a (wired) headset.

Is blue light considered electromagnetic radiation?

Blue light is part of the electromagnetic spectrum, wedged between ionizing radiation and micro/radio waves. As a result, I consider blue light electromagnetic radiation. The thing with blue light is that we need to expose ourselves to it while the sun is out but avoid exposure while the sun is down. You can read more about that in my article about blue light blocking glasses and this YouTube video.

Should I use EMF blockers?

Blocking EMFs is an excellent way to reduce your exposure. Just keep in mind that many EMF blockers negatively impact the operation of the blocked device. For example, putting a Faraday cage over your Wi-Fi router effectively disables its Wi-Fi antennas.

The more practical approach is to either harmonize the EMFs or use a radiation shield to protect certain body parts (without disabling the whole device).

Do EMF-blocking phone cases work?

I don’t think EMF-blocking phone cases are a great solution for reducing EMF exposure from cell phones. If you block all EMFs originating from a cell phone, the device won’t be able to maintain a cellular, Bluetooth or Wi-Fi connection.

I think the better approach is to use wired headphones to be able to keep the phone away from your body while making phone calls. That means not having the phone in your pants pocket while making calls, as it might cause tissue heating in areas you don’t want heated.

Does EMF shielding paint work?

Yes, it does — and I think it’s a great option for new construction, or if you had planned to paint the interior of your home anyway. Just keep in mind that any rooms painted with EMF blocking paint will likely have very poor Wi-Fi and cellular reception (or none at all). So I’d use this paint for bedrooms, but not for areas of the house that require wireless connectivity.

Can the TriField TF2 detect pollution from 5G cellular networks?

Yes, the TriField TF2 can detect pollution from fourth and fifth generation radio frequency bandwidths (600 MHz to 6 GHz). It doesn’t detect radiation from bandwidths between 24 to 86 GHz, which might be in use in the future.

Can I measure the impact of EMF mitigation devices using an EMF meter?

You can certainly measure the impact of EMF blocking devices using an EMF meter. For example, if you cover your smart meter with a Faraday cage, you should see significantly lower EMF readings as a result.

However, you won’t be able to measure the impact of devices such as Lifetune because they don’t block EMFs. Instead, they change the structure of the radiation to be more in line with naturally-occurring EMFs. To measure their impact you’d need to use encephalography.

Do Aires EMF mitigation devices require a battery?

No, Aires EMF mitigation devices are powered by external radiation and don’t require a dedicated power source. You can read more about how the low-voltage microchip in Aires devices works in this article

In a nutshell, when a wave impulse strikes any part of the circuit, its energy gets discharged to the circuit’s center and automatically redistributes throughout the entire circuit through nano slits or channels. That redistribution creates enough voltage to power the microchip.

In case you’re wondering, it doesn’t take much electromagnetic radiation to power the Aires chip. Natural radiation from the earth, the sun and your body is enough to keep it running.

Here’s what the company told me when I reached out for clarification about how this aspect of the technology works:

“Our devices harness the ambient electromagnetic radiation using the topological circuit of the microprocessor’s resonator antenna. They are designed to function using whatever amount of electromagnetic radiation there is, the effectiveness is proportional to the available ambient radiation to power it.”

Wrap-Up: Why You Should Take EMF Protection Seriously

Based on all the scientific evidence I’ve seen so far, it’s not clear if or how electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic radiation may impact our health and well-being in the long-run. 

Most of the studies that I’ve seen are flawed and were not properly designed. That makes having a fact-based discussion about the potentially harmful impact of EMFs on our health almost impossible.

However, there is sufficient evidence that EMFs impact us on a cellular level by modulating the currents in our bodies and causing tissue heating

In my opinion, assuming that man-made EMFs do not cause harm to our health is foolish. Humans have made this assumption in the past, and it tends to not end well.

Because of that fact, I’ve decided to pursue a practical approach to dealing with EMFs (similar to how I deal with environmental toxins): I first assess my exposure, and then I take steps to remove the worst offenders.

I also implement mitigation strategies that are cost-effective and that further reduce my exposure, including turning off unused devices and experimenting with harmonizers or neutralizers such as Lifetune*.

From there, I continue doing research and I keep adapting my strategy as I learn more. 

Now that you know about the potential dangers of EMFs, what are you going to do about them? Let me know by leaving a comment below!

Medical Disclaimer

The information shared on this blog is for educational purposes only, is not a substitute for the advice of medical doctors or registered dieticians (which we are not) and should not be used to prevent, diagnose, or treat any condition. Consult with a physician before starting a fitness regimen, adding supplements to your diet, or making other changes that may affect your medications, treatment plan or overall health. MichaelKummer.com and its owner MK Media Group, LLC are not liable for how you use and implement the information shared here, which is based on the opinions of the authors formed after engaging in personal use and research. We recommend products, services, or programs and are sometimes compensated for doing so as affiliates. Please read our Terms and Conditions for further information, including our privacy policy.

2 thoughts on “How Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) Impact Your Health”

  1. Aires Tech claims that its technology is patented. However, the alleged patents turn out to be design patents, which protect an aesthetic impression (the Aires devices look very nice indeed), but not a technical effect. I agree, that EMF of all devices we have in our homes and carry with us could be problem, and that we must hope that turns out to be not the case at the end, since our way of living of today relies on these devices. However, EMF mitigation devices like the Aires devices certainly will be no solution but have as only purpose to pull money out of the peoples pockets. The Aires tech papers appear to be bullshit on a high level. I do not know whether and how EMF radiation passing directly through an Aires device is changed or attenuated. However, the Aires device attached to your iPhone is much too small to have any noticeably effect on the radiation emitted by the antenna arrangement of your iPhone. That a device carried about the neck could help against radiation coming from all directions is obviously complete nonsense. I had thought that you were more critical on indeed astonishing claims of this company.

    Reply
    • Hi Volker,

      I’m also skeptical of Aires and updated my wording in the article right after publishing it to reflect that (caches might not have cleared yet, so give it maybe a day or so). I do agree that a lot of the information the company has put out there is confusing and hard to understand (that’s a red flag).

      Regarding their patents, they do have patents related to their core functionality but they only filed those in Russia but not in the US or Canada (like their design patents). See https://new.fips.ru/iiss/document.xhtml?faces-redirect=true&id=17ed1c397927f76d19f84094eafbd1f7, for example.

      Since the math and science are over my head, I’m hoping that a physicist will chime in and explain if their data is valid or not.

      Reply

Leave a Comment